Loading... 小岑手里有一个免费一年的AWS EC2 和一个廉价VPS VULTR,于是做了个简单的对比 对比型号 VULTR: MEM:768M SSD:15G AWS MEM:1G unixbench测试 SSD:10G 下面是unixbench5.13的对比数据 <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>VULTR</strong></span> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Mon Dec 29 2014 21:55:44 - 22:24:16 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 41356491.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4049.2 MWIPS (13.0 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 5911.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1286933.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 392889.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2774735.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 3069565.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 465608.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 16334.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10543.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1338.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 5609901.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 41356491.1 3543.8 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4049.2 736.2 Execl Throughput 43.0 5911.7 1374.8 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1286933.1 3249.8 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 392889.2 2374.0 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2774735.1 4784.0 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3069565.9 2467.5 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 465608.5 1164.0 Process Creation 126.0 16334.9 1296.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10543.0 2486.5 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1338.0 2230.0 System Call Overhead 15000.0 5609901.1 3739.9 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 2158.4 ======= Script description and score comparison completed! ======= <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>AWS EC2</strong></span> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Benchmark Run: Mon Dec 29 2014 21:55:58 - 22:24:02 1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests Dhrystone 2 using register variables 32935481.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Double-Precision Whetstone 4192.1 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples) Execl Throughput 4776.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1218700.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 336910.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 3000748.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 2370286.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 348999.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 14330.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8386.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1073.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 4406123.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 32935481.1 2822.2 Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4192.1 762.2 Execl Throughput 43.0 4776.1 1110.7 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1218700.7 3077.5 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 336910.1 2035.7 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 3000748.2 5173.7 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2370286.3 1905.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 348999.4 872.5 Process Creation 126.0 14330.4 1137.3 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8386.1 1977.9 Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1073.4 1789.1 System Call Overhead 15000.0 4406123.8 2937.4 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score 1841.6 ======= Script description and score comparison completed! ======= VULTR的VPS的测试分数还是很给力的 下面是ping值的测试 <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>VULTR</strong></span> <a href="https://www.crazycen.com/usr/uploads/2014/12/image3.png"><img style="background-image: none; padding-top: 0px; padding-left: 0px; display: inline; padding-right: 0px; border: 0px;" title="image" src="https://www.crazycen.com/usr/uploads/2014/12/image_thumb3.png" alt="image" width="589" height="280" border="0" style=""></a> <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>AWS EC2</strong></span> <a href="https://www.crazycen.com/usr/uploads/2014/12/image4.png"><img style="background-image: none; padding-top: 0px; padding-left: 0px; display: inline; padding-right: 0px; border: 0px;" title="image" src="https://www.crazycen.com/usr/uploads/2014/12/image_thumb4.png" alt="image" width="589" height="280" border="0" style=""></a> 两者都是NTT的线路到日本,通病就是不分地区联通比较高200-400ms之间,偶有线路不稳定的状况 下面是硬盘速度测试 <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>VULTR</strong></span> <a href="mailto:root@install:~/root">root@install:~/root</a># dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.10572 s, 86.4 MB/s <a href="mailto:root@install:~/root">root@install:~/root</a># dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=8k count=256k conv=fdatasync 262144+0 records in 262144+0 records out 2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 4.70967 s, 456 MB/s <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>AWS EC2</strong></span> root@ip-172-31-15-174:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync 4096+0 records in 4096+0 records out 268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 17.318 s, 15.5 MB/s root@ip-172-31-15-174:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=8k count=256k conv=fdatasync 262144+0 records in 262144+0 records out 2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 40.0588 s, 53.6 MB/s VULTR的硬盘速度还是很给力的! 好了简单的测试到这里。 Last modification:October 6, 2023 © Allow specification reprint Support Appreciate the author AliPayWeChat Like 如果觉得我的文章对你有用,请随意赞赏
One comment
用站长工具测试还是不大好