VULTR日本VPS和AWS EC2日本速度测试对比

小岑手里有一个免费一年的AWS EC2 和一个廉价VPS VULTR,于是做了个简单的对比

对比型号

VULTR:

MEM:768M  SSD:15G

AWS

MEM:1G

unixbench测试 SSD:10G

下面是unixbench5.13的对比数据

VULTR

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Mon Dec 29 2014 21:55:44 – 22:24:16
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       41356491.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     4049.2 MWIPS (13.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               5911.7 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1286933.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          392889.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       2774735.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             3069565.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 465608.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              16334.9 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  10543.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1338.0 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        5609901.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   41356491.1   3543.8
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       4049.2    736.2
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       5911.7   1374.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1286933.1   3249.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     392889.2   2374.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    2774735.1   4784.0
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    3069565.9   2467.5
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     465608.5   1164.0
Process Creation                                126.0      16334.9   1296.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      10543.0   2486.5
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1338.0   2230.0
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    5609901.1   3739.9
========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        2158.4

 
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======

AWS EC2

————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Mon Dec 29 2014 21:55:58 – 22:24:02
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       32935481.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     4192.1 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               4776.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks       1218700.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          336910.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       3000748.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             2370286.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 348999.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                              14330.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   8386.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1073.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        4406123.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   32935481.1   2822.2
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       4192.1    762.2
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       4776.1   1110.7
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0    1218700.7   3077.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     336910.1   2035.7
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    3000748.2   5173.7
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    2370286.3   1905.4
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     348999.4    872.5
Process Creation                                126.0      14330.4   1137.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       8386.1   1977.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1073.4   1789.1
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    4406123.8   2937.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1841.6

 
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======

 

VULTR的VPS的测试分数还是很给力的

下面是ping值的测试

VULTR

《VULTR日本VPS和AWS EC2日本速度测试对比》

AWS EC2

《VULTR日本VPS和AWS EC2日本速度测试对比》

两者都是NTT的线路到日本,通病就是不分地区联通比较高200-400ms之间,偶有线路不稳定的状况

下面是硬盘速度测试

VULTR

root@install:~/root# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 3.10572 s, 86.4 MB/s

root@install:~/root# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=8k count=256k conv=fdatasync
262144+0 records in
262144+0 records out
2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 4.70967 s, 456 MB/s

AWS EC2

root@ip-172-31-15-174:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 17.318 s, 15.5 MB/s

root@ip-172-31-15-174:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=8k count=256k conv=fdatasync
262144+0 records in
262144+0 records out
2147483648 bytes (2.1 GB) copied, 40.0588 s, 53.6 MB/s

VULTR的硬盘速度还是很给力的!

好了简单的测试到这里。

点赞
  1. 偏方网说道:

    用站长工具测试还是不大好

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注

此站点使用Akismet来减少垃圾评论。了解我们如何处理您的评论数据